Is It Better to Be a Member of a Group Than to Be the Leader?

ESSAY Do you agree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a classify than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to frequent your answer. I personally disagree with the statement that it is better to be a member of a group than a leader. It is true that beingness a member is certainly much much comfortable, as you fuck off less obligation, and you are not the one who makes the final decisions.Also, some state may be in addition shy, too reserved or not charismatic enough to become a leader. However, in my opinion, a leader is a member too, but a leader does to a greater extent. First of all, a leader takes responsibility for making decisions and guiding the others in a certain direction. The second reason is that if you take the responsibility of being the leader, you are more active. Thus, your participation in the group is much more interesting and exciting.You are more concerned about what is happening around you, and you do no t just wait for other people to do everything. In other words, you are not passive, and you get involved. Finally, if you are a thoroughly leader, because the others will respect you, and gaining peoples respect is important if you want to have a good place in society. As a conclusion, I would say that, to me, it is more interesting to be a leader than to be only a member, as it can be so much more stimulating and enriching for your personal and professional life.